Newcastle University UCU

Newcastle University UCU

Jo Grady: the miner’s daughter preparing for university picket lines

Jo Grady could hardly be better qualified for her new role. She was born in 1984 into a striking miner’s family; she studied industrial relations at university, and she is a leading expert in trade unions and pension disputes.

This week she will become the new general secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), whose members last year went out on strike over sweeping pension changes, causing two weeks of disruption on campuses across the country. Grady was on the picket lines, with her Glastonbury wellies and her homemade flapjacks.

This year, as she takes over the leadership of the UCU, which represents university librarians, technicians and administrators as well as academic staff, fresh strike ballots are being prepared for September over pensions – again – as well as pay. With the threat of further industrial action looming, Grady says: “It’s a huge responsibility. I take that very seriously. But this has to be resolved.”

The original strike centred on proposals to overhaul radically the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) – the country’s largest private sector pension scheme with 400,000 members at 67 universities and colleges. The changes would have ended guaranteed pension benefits for university staff, who would have lost up to £10,000 a year in retirement.

In an impressive show of solidarity and resourcefulness, UCU members did their homework, held their nerve, and saw off the immediate threat. It was a huge victory in which Grady played a key role as co-founder of USS Briefs – a research project that brought members up to speed on the detail behind the dispute. She was later elected to the union’s national dispute committee and then its national executive committee.

Since then key recommendations designed to resolve the dispute and preserve defined pension benefits in the long term have not been fully implemented, says Grady. “All of the sacrifices and compromises staff made have yet to be rewarded with the implementation of the proposals,” she says.

“It’s a defining issue. If we don’t stand up for this, what we are allowing is the managed decline of our pension scheme. Professions are defined by their terms and conditions and benefits, and secure retirement and pension income is one of those things.”

Grady, from Wakefield in West Yorkshire, was the first in her family to go to university. Her father was a striking miner who worked at the Lofthouse colliery, among others; her mother raised her and her two brothers against the backdrop of one of the most bitter and protracted industrial disputes in living memory.

The experience shaped her. She grew up on stories about the kindness of her community, dining on tinned peaches from unlabelled cans donated by a family friend who worked at the local canning factory, and the importance of pulling together and looking after each other.

“I grew up in a politicised household,” she says. “My dad is a central figure for me in how I think about things. I grew up with a sense of fairness, and of what injustice looks like, and also healthy cynicism about critically analysing the way information is delivered to you. That sense of ‘when we stand together and we act collectively we are stronger’ has always informed my thinking. When you grow up in a working-class community, you really feel that.”

Striking university staff last year
Pinterest
 Striking university staff last year – but the dispute was not fully resolved. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Barcroft Images

After the miners’ strike finally ended, her father left the colliery and her parents opened a pub – “the community living room” – where Grady worked on Saturdays and Christmas Day, sending lonely older neighbours home with Christmas leftovers. After school and A-levels at Wakefield College, she studied industrial relations at Lancaster University, where she went on to do a master’s on the causes, consequences and solutions of the pensions crisis. Her PhD was about pension disputes, trade unions and the pension crisis.

She landed a job as a lecturer at Leicester University in 2009, moving to Sheffield where she became a senior lecturer in employment relations in 2017. “I’ve spent the past 14 to 15 years researching trade unions, industrial relations and pensions. I’m not sure there’s anybody more specialised in that area in the UK than me.”

Grady admits it was a huge emotional burden having to tell her students last year about the teaching they would miss because of their lecturers’ industrial action. “To know you are essentially abandoning these people who you care very much for and who rely on you, yes, that was difficult.”

Overwhelmingly, however, she says students gave lecturers their backing – with many of them joining the picket lines and sharing the banter, sense of solidarity and the cakes – and going on to organise student occupations in support.

For staff, there was a new camaraderie and shared sense of pride. “We were not all alone in our offices, we were together every day. It was a real democratising moment where all the hierarchies that existed in your day-to-day working environment just disappeared.”

The pickets braved “the beast from the east”. Only the geographers, says Grady, were appropriately dressed. “I don’t think the employers could have predicted that by allowing the dispute to go on for as long as it did that they were creating that alternative space for those solidarities to flourish.”

As the grassroots candidate to succeed the outgoing UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, forced to retire in February because of ill-health, Grady won with a significant mandate, picking up 64% of the vote in the second round, with a record turnout. Come September she will be touring branches up and down the country, doing everything possible to get people to vote for strike action.

This time there will be simultaneous strike ballots, one to defend pensions, and a second to secure a fair deal on pay, workload, equality, and job security. Ballots open on 9 September and will run until the end of October.

On the pensions ballot, Grady warns: “We are heading towards another round of industrial action, because employers are refusing to cover the cost of the extra contributions USS has demanded.” And on the second ballot: “Pay has been held down for too long. It is time for a comprehensive deal for university staff on pay, equality, workload and job security that puts staff first.”

The UCU’s higher education committee will meet in November to discuss the results of the ballot and what comes next. Grady is optimistic. “One of the refreshing things that you see in the sector is an appetite for people to stand up for themselves.” If strike action follows, there will almost certainly be cake.

 

Defending our profession

22 July 2019

UCU’s general secretary-elect, Jo Grady, has updated members in higher education on the position of the employers on USS and the annual negotiations.

As we head towards nationwide strike ballots on USS and on pay-related issues in September, I want to update you on our progress.

UCU’s officials and elected negotiators are working hard to get a better deal for you. We don’t ask you to vote for strike action until we have made every effort to negotiate, consulted our professional advisers, and concluded that industrial action is the only way to achieve our goals.

In both disputes, employers have refused even to meet us halfway. But that is not a reason to despair. We have to remember how quickly employers came back to the negotiating table when last year’s USS dispute started. Next time, we will be even better prepared. We have new teams of elected negotiators, and we will be able to secure a good deal when we act collectively. We also have to remember that our students supported us last time, because they understood that staff, not vice-chancellors, make universities what they are. UCU and the NUS are continuing to work closely together to stand up for staff and students and I am sure that we will receive strong support once again.

By standing up for pensions, pay, equality and job security, we are defending not just ourselves but our profession. The sector’s income has increased by a third since the beginning of the financial crisis, and that is thanks to our hard work in an incredibly difficult environment. How have employers rewarded us? With intensifying casualisation, wage suppression, and pension cuts. Some of us may not feel the effects of cuts and inequalities directly, but we can all appreciate what they do to our colleagues. Securing national agreements on these things is the most efficient way to make the sector fairer, more inclusive, and more appealing to future generations of university staff.

USS

It’s clear from my meetings with employers that we face a similar situation to the previous USS dispute, with employers refusing to listen to our main concerns. Employers failed to get USS to implement the most important recommendations of the Joint Expert Panel (JEP). Now they are forcing some of the costs of USS’s unwarranted contribution increases on to us, despite all the sacrifices we have already made: from the massive cuts in 2011 and 2014 to the deducted pay which employers pocketed after last year’s strike. In order to get employers to cover these costs, we may have to count on winning the casting vote of the independent chair of the USS Joint Negotiating Committee, Sir Andrew Cubie. UCU’s negotiators will make the best case they can, and I will report in more detail when we have an outcome.

Members have asked me whether there might be a legal solution. UCU has been investigating this option from various angles since I was elected. We have met and commissioned advice from several experts on USS and our employers’ actions, and I will soon be able to tell you more about the progress we have made. However, none of these solutions will come soon enough to avert the contribution increases which we are facing.

These increases have consequences. Members are already leaving the scheme because of the increases we have started paying as a result of the 2017 valuation. Further increases will likely lead to more departures, jeopardising individual members’ retirement savings and destabilising the scheme. Preventing that is one of UCU’s top priorities.

Pay, equality, job security, and workload

UCU’s elected negotiators and officials recently attended another meeting with employers on the 2019 pay claim. Again, we are in a position where employers simply refuse to make us a meaningful offer unless they are faced with a credible threat of strike action.

Our demands are modest. As far as pay is concerned, even if employers granted us the 3% (plus RPI) increase we are asking for, it would not bring our pay back in line with the level it was at ten years ago, after years of real-terms cuts. Given our willingness to compromise, we are deeply disappointed by their offer of only 1.8% on pay; no action on inequality or casualisation; and nothing whatsoever on workload.

Preparing for the ballots

I hope you will bear this in mind when you receive your ballot papers in September. Look out for further details of the tour of branches which I’ll be undertaking during the ballot period, and don’t forget to ensure that your branch can keep you informed by updating your membership information – especially your current institution, email address, and postal address. And please continue to get in touch with me via email.

Jo Grady
UCU general secretary elect

Get ready for autumn ballots

30-minute solidarity climate stoppage

Support UCU’s TUC motion for a 30-minute solidarity climate stoppage

Millions of school students across the globe have struck for climate justice. Their action has forced governments across the world and the UK parliament to declare a climate emergency. We need to keep up this pressure. If this is not achieved then the earth’s climate will have passed a dangerous tipping point with temperatures rising up to 4 degrees by the end of the century – in the lifetime of young people alive today.

Climate is a trade union issue. Trade unionists must play a central role in shaping the way society’s economic and social organisation meets the needs of future generations and the planet.

Greta Thurnberg’s call for a climate strike and for adults, workers and trade unionists to join the global school students’ strike on 20 September 2019 is one that trade unionists from all unions must take seriously. The UK School Climate Network has supported this call and asks trade unionists to support. The strike will initiate a week of climate action.

In line with motions passed at UCU Congress, the union is submitting the motion below to the forthcoming TUC Congress which takes place from 8 to 11 September in Brighton.

71% of university staff say insecure contracts have damaged their mental health

Report says staff are working unpaid, holding down multiple jobs and struggling to pay the bills

The UCU report says higher education staff are putting off long-term plans like starting a family and even struggling to pay day-to-day bills because of a lack of security and steady income.

Over two-thirds of respondents (71%) said they believed their mental health had been damaged by working on insecure contracts and more than two-fifths (43%) said it had impacted on their physical health.

The report warns that the widespread use of casual contracts is damaging the quality of research and the education students receive. It says staff are constantly faced with the choice of cutting corners with preparation, marking and feedback, or continuing to work unpaid. Respondents say they lack access to adequate teaching facilities or places where they can meet students to discuss their work.

The union said the report also rubbished claims by employers that flexible contracts were supported by staff. Almost all (97%) staff on a fixed-term contract said that they would rather be on a permanent contract and four-fifths (80%) of hourly-paid staff said they would sacrifice flexibility to secure a job with guaranteed hours.

Respondents say they are “living in limbo” unable to make any long-term plans and feel that universities exploit their desperation. One says they have a minimum of three jobs at any one time and never know when they will be paid. Others say that a lack of basic rights, such as sick pay, means they cannot afford to be off ill and have to compromise their health to get paid.

UCU acting general secretary Paul Cottrell said: ‘Staff teaching students and performing research in our universities say their mental health is suffering because of a lack of security. Students would be shocked to learn that many of their lecturers are forced to take on multiple jobs and are struggling to pay the bills.

‘This report makes it clear that staff do not want to be forced onto these types of exploitative contracts. Despite their best efforts, staff just simply cannot stay on top of their teaching, marking, feedback and research employed like this and it is students who suffer.

‘Universities need to understand this is a real problem that must be dealt with, not excused or underplayed. Some institutions have worked with us to move staff on to more secure contracts, but overall the higher education sector is too happy to exploit its army of casualised staff.’

The union said research in the US shows that students who take large numbers of courses with teachers employed on insecure contracts, or who are in institutions with large numbers of non-permanent staff, tend to graduate at a lower rate and are more likely to drop out of college.

The Delphi Project argues that, no matter how good they are as teachers, those employed on casual contracts have working conditions that make it impossible for them to consistently reproduce the high quality interactions with students that can be achieved by those on decent, secure contracts.

Impact on the individual

·         Participants say that they are doing 45% of their work without pay

·         61% had held two or more jobs in total in the last 12 months

·         48% had held two or more jobs in the education sector

·         60% said they had struggled to make ends meet

·         40% said they experienced problems paying bills

·         71% said they believed their mental health had been damaged by working on insecure contracts

·         43% reported that they believed their working conditions had damaged their physical health

·         83% said it was hard to make long-term financial commitments such as buying a house

·         83% said it was hard to make long-term family plans

·         85% said they had considered leaving the sector in the last 12 months, with the number one reason for doing so being the lack of job security

·         97% of respondents on a fixed-term contract said that they would rather be on a permanent contract

·         80% of hourly paid staff responding said that they would rather be on a contract that guaranteed them hours, even if it meant less flexibility

 

Impact on quality

·         67% of teaching staff said that they did not have enough paid time to enable them to prepare adequately for their classes

·         73% said that they did not have enough paid time to complete their marking

·         75% said that they did not have enough paid time to undertake the scholarship necessary to stay on top of their subjects

·         71% said that they did not have enough paid time to give their students the feedback they deserved

·         44% said they did not have access to adequate facilities to provide feedback and support to their students

·         73% of researchers said that research they had been involved with had been negatively affected by employment on short-term contracts

·         81% said that their own research activity had been negatively affected by employment on short-term contracts

 

UCU surveyed 3,802 casualised staff working in higher education between 16 January and 19 February 2019.